Monday, October 25, 2010

UNDERSTANDING YOUR ABS PART II

Understanding Your Abs, Part II

Core Training

Stay up late some evening, and I have no doubt you’ll be bombarded for core training products like the Bender Ball, Ab Dolly, or an assortment of other ridiculous contraptions promising to help sexify your abs.

In Part 1 of Understanding Your Abs, I did my best to explain the true role of your core (HINT: it’s not just crunching!), and why it’s important to train your core in a more real-world, functional manner.

In case you don’t want to go back and read all that, here’s a quick synopsis:

Can your core crunch and move around in a bunch of different directions?

Sure.

But is this the most efficacious use of our time? Is this what our core was designed to do in sports, and in life?

Probably not.

Instead, we need to examine crunches and sit-ups in more depth, along with why core stability is something that we should all be striving to achieve.

Who needs crunches anyway?

Everybody and their mother can tell you that crunches train your “core.” What they may or may not be able to tell you is that you’re training spinal flexion.

First, it’s important to note where you’re getting your movement; a true crunch where your lumbar spine doesn’t move focuses on spinal flexion through the thoracic spine, or upper back.

People will obviously tell you that crunches spare the spine and isolate the abs. To an extent, they’re correct – when compared to a full range of motion sit-up, they probably are a superior option.

What people fail to discuss are the broader implications of performing a ton of crunches in their programming. Just because they aren’t hurting your back doesn’t mean they’re a great exercise.

From a global perspective, I can’t tell you how many people I see with jacked up shoulders and necks. Their postures often look the same – their head is carried in front of their body, their shoulders are slouched forward, etc.

Try this quick and dirty test: Walk through a door, any door. What passes through the door first, your chest and torso, or your head and neck?

If it’s your head and neck, Houston, we could have a problem.

Crunches shorten your rectus abdominus (RA), or six-pack muscles. Your RA runs from the bottom of your rib cage to your pelvis. When you constantly shorten this muscle from the top down, you pull your rib cage down and contribute to this slouched shoulder and head-forward position.

Those crunches may spare the spine when compared to sit-ups, or isolate the core, but they also play a role in creating dysfunction up the kinetic chain.

They may make you’re A-B-Z look sick, but it doesn’t do anything for your upper extremity alignment and function.

And before we take this idea too far, I’m not going to sit here and tell you that crunches are the only factor contributing to poor posture. The fact of the matter is a lot of things lead to poor posture: Poor training programs that are focused on the chest versus the upper back, horrible posture while sitting at a desk/in a car, and poor core training all play roles.

But poor core training exercises do play a role.

In contrast, a sit-up where you go through a full range of motion trains flexion not only through the thoracic spine but also the lumbar spine, or lower back.

People originally moved away from sit-ups because they thought they were bad for their back.

And in this case, they were probably right.

Stuart McGill has done extensive research and found that when it comes to lumbar flexion and extension, your spine only has a certain number of flexion/extension cycles in it. The question becomes, how many cycles does YOUR low back have in it?

Obviously, there isn’t a hard and fast rule. Some people may go through hundreds of thousands of cycles with no ill effects. Others might go through 25 or 50% of that number and end up with low back issues.

Everyone is individual, and it’s hard to make a blanket statement on the topic. I can tell you this, though: It’s rare, if ever, that I find a need to include crunches or sit-ups into a program.

Let’s take this thought process a step further. Crunches and sit-ups ONLY train spinal flexion.

What if I could give you exercise options that not only give you great looking abs, but ones that are functional and promote good posture and alignment as well?

In this case, we need to differentiate between two different types of core development: Core strength versus core stability.

The Need for Core Stability Training

The core has been defined as a box with the diaphragm on the top, the muscles of the pelvic floor and hips on the bottom, the abdominals in the front and the spinal erectors and gluteals on the back.

Core stability, however, is a very open ended term. Pundits will argue until the cows come home that you can’t define core stability, or that it’s not something tangible that you can measure.

In this case, I would have to disagree. Perhaps core stability isn’t the best term, maybe we can and should get more specific. We could say “pelvic” stability, “lumbar” stability, or even something more all encompassing like “trunk” stability.

I choose to use the term core stability in my writing because it’s the most universally understood term.

For a basic definition, core stability is the ability to lock the core/torso/pelvis in a specific, preferably neutral position and maintain that alignment while resisting movement/motion imposed by the extremities.


When it comes to stability training, it’s hard to argue against its importance. Even a cursory look at the research shows that a lack of stability can lead to a host of lower back and lower extremity issues.

While many are quick to blame hamstring strains or “pulled hammies” on muscle imbalances between the quads and hamstrings, improving core stability may play a role in decreasing the likelihood of further injury and expedite the road to recovery.

In a study by Sherry [1], injured athletes who completed a rehabilitation protocol that included core stability exercises not only got back on the field faster than controls, but only 7% reported another injury in the next year. In comparison, 70% of the controls suffered a recurrence of their hamstring injury in the following year.

With regards to low back pain, Stuart McGill has repeatedly espoused the benefits of incorporating his “Big 3” (side plank, birddog, and curl-up) in rehabilitating injured lower backs. As you can imagine, we don’t use the curl-up; instead, we opt for a front plank/pillar hold instead.

So hopefully we can see that there’s a definite need for core stability training in our programming if we want a healthy lower back, hips and legs. But what about the upper extremity?

Can core training positively or negatively affect our upper extremity function?

I think so. Read on….

Core Training for the Upper Body?

As we discussed before, exercises like crunches reinforce poor upper body alignment and movement. Here’s another quick and dirty test you can try out:

1) Sit up as tall as you can in your chair, or better yet, stand up nice and tall. Take your arms in front of your body and reach up as high as you can. Get a feeling for how high you can reach, along with how easy it is to get there.

2) Now, I want you to perform a crunch, or at the very least, slouch your shoulders. Now, try and do the same thing – reach up as high overhead as you can.

What happened?

If you’re like every other human being our there, you couldn’t reach as high, and you might’ve even had pain when you slouched forward.

Now imagine performing thousands and thousands of crunches – what do you think that’s going to do to your upper body alignment, posture and mobility?

It’s going to make it worse.

When your shoulders are slouched forward, your thoracic spine is in a position of increased kyphosis. When your upper back is in a poor alignment, it sets of a cascade of events – now, your scapulae (shoulder blades) are in an improper alignment, which puts your shoulders in a poor alignment.

Is it any wonder why we see so many neck and shoulder injuries? It all starts with thoracic spine alignment.

At the end of the day, chances are you sit in a shoulders slouched posture for hours throughout the day. Why on Earth would you want to reinforce this pattern when you get in the gym?

It makes no sense.

Instead, we should focus on exercises that allow us to get tall and open up the chest. We’ll not only have less pain in the shoulders, neck and elbows, but we’ll breathe easier and feel better in general.

Let’s look at how I outline my core training programs to maximize your training time and quality.

A Superior Way to Outline Core Training

Let me rant for one moment before I outline the exercises. There are two things that really bug me about people who write on the Internet:

1. When they write blogs and articles where they tear down an idea, yet never propose an alternative or superior method.

2. When people rant and rave about training methods, yet train very few people themselves.

In this case, I want to show you exactly how I plan my core training programs so you can start incorporating these exercises into your workouts immediately. These are tried and true tools that I use on a daily basis with my clients and athletes.

If someone were training four days per week, the core training split would look something like this:

- Anti-lateral flexion

- Anti-extension

- Anti-rotation

- Hip flexion w/neutral spine

Each day you would train a different quality/movement pattern. And if you only train three days per week, you can simply throw in the anti-lateral flexion work into your warm-up using some offset waiters walks or famers carries.

It really doesn’t have to be that hard.

I’m sure you want some examples, so lets’ take a quick look at each “branch” of my core stability training.

Anti-Lateral Flexion

Anti-lateral flexion is the ability to resist a side-bending motion. Exercise examples from this class of exercises include Waiter’s walks (pictured above), as well as kettlebell windmills.

Anti-Extension

Anti-extension exercises may give you the most bang for your training buck. In this case, the goal is to resist lumbar extension; instead, focus on squeezing the gluteals/obliques so you get hip extension instead.

Half-kneeling exercises are fantastic if you have side-to-side discrepancies, and tall kneeling is fantastic if you’re a bit more symmetrical. These also lead into bigger-bang exercises such as ball and ab wheel rollouts.

Anti-Rotation

Anti-rotation exercises may be the easiest to understand. In this case, all you’re doing is trying to resist rotation around your lumbar spine.

Hopefully, you’re also noticting a theme here as well. Start with more isolative variations for the core initially to improve basic stability and recruitment. Once you’ve begun to optimize your stabilization patterns, you can move into more challenging and integrated variations.

Hip Flexion w/Neutral Spine

Hip flexion with a neutral spine may be the most challenging branch of core exercises. Many are quick to dismiss this option, but I feel this is integral if your goal is to go through full range of motion exercises such as squats, without losing your lumbar spine alignment.

As you can see, I need some work on this movement pattern myself. I feel like a bigger physioball would help a bit, but I still have a subtle “tuck” at the midpoint of the motion. I need to either keep my core tighter, or at the very least, reduce my range of motion a bit to make sure the core is stable throughout.

Hey, everyone’s got things to work on – myself included. :)

What are YOU hoping to achieve?

At the end of the day, you have to ask yourself:

What am I hoping to achieve with my training? What is the end goal?

As you can obviously tell, I’m a huge proponent of core stability work. But what if your goal is to get those shredded abs like “The Situation?”

Many will tell you that they simply incorporate crunches into their workout because they want six-pack abs. And I get that goal, I really do.

But the question becomes, do you need crunches to get really lean?

The answer is no.

In fact, I’ve had numerous figure competitors that I’ve trained who have performed exactly ZERO crunches leading up to a contest, and still developed some sick abs.

They used the exercises I outlined above, but most importantly, they dialed in their training and nutrition.

That’s not the sexy answer, but that’s the truth. If you want abs a serious set of abs, get your butt in the gym and train hard. Then go home and eat a clean diet. Rinse and repeat.

It’s amazing what happens when you put these two things together.

Summary

I hope that this post has given you a firm idea of how important core stability training is, and how to effectively integrate it into your current exercise routine.

At the end of the day, you’re free to train however you’d like. But with my clients and athletes, my goal is always to help them achieve their goals in the safest and most effective fashion.

And for me, core stability work is where it’s at.

THANKS MIKE ROBERTSON

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Sunday Ride in the park? and some FEEDBACK?

The First two pictures are of the highway exit off of #1 Highway. It's about 3km past the SPLIT ROCK on the TOP of the MALAHAT.




GO WEST on Mill Bay rd. as shown in the picture below.






The picture below is the Meeting point for the ride. Two yellow gates and a Large Gravel Mound to the right of the gates.

A group of us are still planning to ride tomorrow afternoon around 130pm, for approx 90-120 minutes of riding.

Direction to the starting point of the ride are fairly simple. You take the mill bay road exit and circle back under the highway, as if you where headed back to victoria. We will meet at the beginning of the OLD HAUL road.( two yellow gates). See the provided pictures for exact location.

See you tomorrow

Dave

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Core Exercises and Low back health


Get our FREE Newsletter!

You'll get immediate access to the f

Understanding Your Abs

There’s been tons of talk lately about the abs, and even more specifically, the rectus abdominis (RA). After all, everyone wants that lean, sexy six-pack before summer hits, right?

Here’s the problem: We’re still caught up in outdated training methods, and not focused on what science has brought to light over the past 5-10 years. Let’s take a quick look at the actual anatomy of your abs, as well as the various functions that your RA provides.

Anatomy

The RA is a large, beaded muscle that runs from your xiphoid process and bottom of your rib cage to your pubic symphisis. It’s interesting (and important) to note that instead of being one long, continuous muscle, the RA actually is broken up into several smaller sections. But more on that later.

The RA has several well-defined roles, along with some lesser-known roles, too. Let’s examine each.

Functions

The primary functions of your RA include:

- Trunk flexion/Resisting Trunk Extension
- Posterior Pelvic Tilt
- Transmission of “hoop” stresses

Let’s look at each in a little bit more depth, as this is where the story starts to unfold.

Trunk Flexion

Any trainer or fitness enthusiast who knows anything can tell you the RA can promote flexion of the trunk. This is why you’ve seen the ridiculous number of ab rollers, Bender balls, and other gimmicky guru crap being sold at 2 am in the morning for decades.

The idea, initially, was that sit-ups were the best to promote this flexion movement pattern. Then, people started looking deeper and decided that sit-ups placed too much compressive loading on the back, or that they didn’t “isolate” the RA from the hip flexors. Thus, crunches were deemed better for “isolating” the abs and keeping the back healthy.

The problem, however, is that while your RA is capable of producing trunk flexion, the underlying anatomy leads us to believe that this role isn’t nearly as important s the fitness industry has given it credit for. At the Chicago Perform Better Summit in 2007, world reknowned spinal biomechanist Dr. Stuart McGill went so far as to say that if your RA was really there for crunching and trunk flexion, instead of having the beaded sub-sections, you would have one long, continuous hamstring instead!

We also need to ask ourselves another question: At what cost are we crunching? This is where we have to examine the big picture. Will trunk flexion help “bring out” our abs? Maybe – but at what cost? When we examine the big picture, we start to realize several things.

1 – Trunk flexion works to shorten our RA. Doing so exerts a downward pull on our ribcage, effectively pulling us into an increased thoracic kyphosis or “slouched” upper body posture. Not only is this aesthetically unattractive, but virtually useless to us as weight trainers, fitness enthusiasts or athletes. By pulling our body into an increased kyphosis, we lose the ability to get our scapulae into the appropriate positions and increase the likelihood of shoulder and rotator cuff problems.

2 – Research by McGill and others has shown that repetitive flexion/extension of the spine is injurious. Our spine only has so many flexion/extension cycles in it; once we hit a certain threshold, we get injured!

Mike Boyle has a great analogy here – it’s like a credit card. Bend a new credit card back and forth and, initially, it bounces back. But if you continue to bend that card, you eventually start to see a white crack. Continue to bend it back and forth, and over time that crack leads to a break. Your spine is not much different.

Here’s another way to think about this – instead of thinking about promoting movement, start to think about how your muscles work to control or resist various movements as well. In this case, your RA not only promotes trunk flexion, but it also works to resist trunk extension! It’s not rocket science, but it’s a huge step forward in your thinking. Far too often, we only think of how muscles work in an open-chain, textbook definition, instead of what they do in real life.

However, there might be some exceptions to this rule – I can think of a few high-end athletes who might need some judiciously included trunk flexion in their programming. For most of the population, however, hopefully we can agree that crunching and trunk flexion movements probably aren’t in the best interest of our bodies.

Posterior Pelvic Tilt

The second function of the RA is to promote posterior pelvic tilt, and/or to control pelvic alignment. We can thank Florence Kendall and her fantastic book Muscles: Testing and Function for tuning us into this one.

(Note: If you are unfamiliar with the concept of force coupling or pelvic alignment, definitely check out my “Hips Don’t Lie” article.)

While many are focused on upper vs. lower RA, it only has one common nerve supply and therefore can’t be isolated into upper and lower sections. Instead, what I feel most people are really focusing on when they think upper vs. lower abs is the difference between movements that promote trunk flexion, and those that control pelvic alignment and/or resist trunk extension.

Many people assume that exercises like leg throws and ab wheel rollouts must hit their “lower” abs harder, because they get so sore following these exercises (especially when compared to crunches). The primary difference, however, is that these movements emphasize the negative portion of the lift. Eccentric exercise has been proven time and again to increase delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), so it’s not so much that you’re training different muscles as it is that you’re shifting the type of training stress. Or it could just be that you’re doing something “new”, which is also virtually guaranteed to make you sore. It’s not necessarily better, it’s just different. But I’m getting a little off target here; I digress.

While the RA does promote posterior pelvic tilt (or gets us back to neutral if we’re in an anterior tilt), it’s rarely the key to the puzzle. For instance, Kendall cites the differences when testing someone’s strength in a curl-up/crunch versus a leg lowering exercise. Often, you’ll see someone with no issues passing a curl-up test, but give them a leg-lowering test where they have to control pelvic alignment and they get crushed.

In this case, it’s not so much a matter of having a weak RA as it is weak external obliques. Try this: Have your client (or yourself) set-up in a pillar hold/plank position with a PVC pipe along their spine. There should be three points of contact; the back of the head, the upper back, and the glutes. Often, you’ll see clients who can keep their hips up, but they exaggerate their kyphosis and lose their 3 points of contact. This is a classic instance of RA dominating the external obliques.

Instead of using all the muscles of the torso to promote core stability, their rectus dominates and “shortens,” pulling them into a slouched position through the upper back. This is something that you’ll see time and again when testing/training both the general population and athletes as well.

Transmission of Stresses and Force

The final piece of the puzzle is promoting or transmitting “hoop” stresses that are generated from the obliques. This concept was originally promoted by Porterfield and DeRosa in their book Mechanical Low Back Pain.

The idea here is simple – instead of working to promote movements around the lumbar spine, the RA (along with the rest of the abdominal muscles) was primarily there to prevent movement and transmit forces! Again, this was a huge shift in thinking.

After reviewing McGill’s Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance for the 1000th time, I ran into this fantastic quote:

“Isometrically training the rectus is consistent with its architecture and stabilizing function to enhance performance and power development in the hips and extremities.”

Quite simply, stop moving and start stabilizing!

Think about a baseball player, for instance: Where does he generate his strength and power from?

I’ve never, in my entire life, seen a big hitter who didn’t have seriously jacked hips and thighs. The premise is simple: The hips/thighs store energy, and upon initiation of the movement transmit that energy into the ground. The ground reacts, transmitting force up the leg, through the core, and into the hands and the bat.

This is a fundamental concept – the core doesn’t promote the power itself. Instead, it transmits the power that the hips and thighs have generated.


Thanks to Mike Robertson for a great article.


Part II will be posted later this week. and let's have some feed back people.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Sunday ride in the park? and some FEEDBACK?


This invitation goes out to anyone who enjoys the Back Country and Mountain Biking.


Hey everyone, we are having a group Mountain Bike ride this weekend. Sunday October 24/10 1:30 pm. The riding will consist mostly of deactivated logging roads with a few GOOD climbs, a little bit of single track and a 20+ minute downhill. Make sure you have all the needed gear. Including a helmet, gloves, a good running mountain bike, spare tube or patch kit, water and maybe something to eat.

Where: Malahat/ Spectacle Lake (map of area below) We'll be meeting on the West side of Highway Number 1 on MILL BAY ROAD. You will have to take the Mill Bay Ferry exit and travel back under Highway 1 to the starting point of the ride. The location is kilometer 17 on the below listed map of the area.... p.s. bring a camera




Also, I would love some feedback from anyone reading my blog, i.e. Victoria K..... I would like to further our conversation on Fitness and all the BULL S*&T that we believe to be TRUE.



One of the world's oldest and most-recognized expedition adventure races, Raid the North Extreme returns with it's eighth edition in 2011. The West Kootenays will provide an inspiring and challenging race course in true Raid the North Extreme style - Real Wilderness, Real Navigation, Real Adventure...

Good work to today's top male and female performances.

Top 3 males as RX'd
Jay J. with a time of 14:37, Jason J. with a time of 19:20
Troy R. with a time of 20:33

Top 3 female as RX'd
Yvonne M with a time of 20:16
Louise B. with a time of 20:30
Suzi B. with a time 24:14